Zemanta - reblog

David Recordon has a nice, optimistic post about the Open Web. I have long felt that the web is the ultimate platform, and the past few years have only strengthened this opinion, as we make the web more programmable and start leveraging it as a multi-way communication medium (in conjunction with such technologies as XMPP). Much of the tech community is focused on leveraging this web around social networks. My hope is that we in the scientific community can take this to the next level, literally connecting data and information first and then the people.

We are producers and consumers of data. The data lies in our labs, in our papers, in central repositories, on web sites and services; a mishmash of static and dynamic data of all types. We use these data to derive information and hypotheses. Call me conceited but as a scientific community we are probably the stewards of a decent, important, chunk, of the worlds collective intelligence. Except that now we have the ability to bring a distributed collective intelligence to life. What do we need?

1. An open data web: We are getting there. I am convinced that this is inevitable and more optimistic as time goes on. Not only is the open data web a necessary requirement for us to arrive at the next era in scientific discovery, it will be the primary driving engine. In the sciences, especially the life sciences, the Semantic Web is going to play a key role in how we find data and relationships, not only among pieces of data, but bringing people and knowledge together
2. Participation: Not just from the early adopters, but the scientific community at large. I am actually less optimistic about this, although I have a feeling that’s just my cynical side. We have an opportunity here folks to really take the next step to solving new problems, leveraging our distributed knowledge
3. Bursty Work: This is my mantra, but needs participation. In discussions about The BioGang, the issue of critical mass has come up, but if you look at what’s been happening recently, we are slowly taking steps there. A community of software savvy scientists, eventually tapped into wet lab scientists can truly come together for what I hope will be a new era of science. Is it going to happen in the next five years? I seriously doubt it, but we’re just planting seeds at this time. A decade? Now we’re talking. Will be fun to see what happens

Aside: After meeting Matt Wood, discussions with Pawel over time, and seeing the activity over on FriendFeed, I am even more optimistic that we can have an impact as a community of like minded geeks with a diversity of interests and skills.

Posted by Deepak Singh | Filed Under Open Science, Science, Web as platform 

On FriendFeed, this post was liked by 9 people and commented on 2 times showView this post on FriendFeedLiked by

• Roger Chen,
• Michael Nielsen,
• Bill Hooker,
• Matt Wood,
• Konrad Förstner,
• Pawel Szczesny,
• Jean-Claude Bradley,
• Piotr Byzia,
• Bora Zivkovic

• June 18, 2008 at 9:15 am Konrad Förstner I think the DiSo project (http://diso-project.org) brings already solutions for many of the technical question that need to be solved to get to an open science web. But yes, the critical mass is ... critical.
• June 18, 2008 at 11:11 am Deepak Good to see you round Konrad, and I really like DiSo, esp the underlying philosophy

CommentsAdd New CommentYou must have JavaScript enabled to comment.

Subscribe:  This Thread

Go to:  My Comments ·  Community Page

View Profile »Powered by Disqus · Learn moreblog comments powered by Disqus

Deepak Singh, The Open Science Web, Jun 2008

Publish to your blog ...

Your blog address:

Like yourblog.blogspot.com, yourblog.typepad.com, yourblog.wordpress.com

Log-in details:

• Username:
• Password:

We will not store your username or password—ever.

« Go back to edit Publish »

... or copy the code into your blog.

Post code

Tags